# 100 DD ans still alive?

**URL:** <https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406>\
**Category:** C2\
**Created:** [January 23, 2016, 11:48pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406 "2016-01-23T23:48:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tsvika\_elberger](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/tsvika_elberger/32/238_2.png) [@tsvika\_elberger](https://forums.collective2.com/u/tsvika_elberger)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2016, 11:48pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/1 "2016-01-23T23:48:18Z")

</div>

I look at the Leading Trading Strategies  
sort by gains and found:TwistSTM3 as new first on the list (yes i am there next too)

[https://collective2.com/details/90483537](https://collective2.com/details/90483537)

with 100% DDD and point where the account is $-107,021  
how this system can gat alive and mimik Real life trading??  
if i trade the same system with real money when i get to “0” the game is over

so 1382.4% is not real…or i miss something?

as far as i understand a 100% DD is lost system and can’t start again like less DD systems…

thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tsvika\_elberger](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/tsvika_elberger/32/238_2.png) [@tsvika\_elberger](https://forums.collective2.com/u/tsvika_elberger)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2016, 11:52pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/2 "2016-01-23T23:52:59Z")

</div>

second question:

when you see this:  
Chance of 10% account loss 100.00%  
Chance of 20% account loss 100.00%  
Chance of 30% account loss 100.00%  
Chance of 40% account loss 100.00%  
Chance of 50% account loss 100.00%

how could system with 100% DD get C2 high score - it unbelivable that c2 score ignore 100% DD  
and other bad risk-reward parameters

C2 Score = 95.2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![c2-auto-trader](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/c2-auto-trader/32/21425_2.png) [@c2-auto-trader](https://forums.collective2.com/u/c2-auto-trader)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2016, 5:42am UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/3 "2016-01-24T05:42:23Z")

</div>

In my Leading strategies list sorted by gains you are on 1st and 2nd places.  
And system you mentioned above has dd of 54.7%. Interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tsvika\_elberger](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/tsvika_elberger/32/238_2.png) [@tsvika\_elberger](https://forums.collective2.com/u/tsvika_elberger)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2016, 7:25am UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/4 "2016-01-24T07:25:44Z")

</div>

It’s more strange - the data change every hour ??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tsvika\_elberger](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/tsvika_elberger/32/238_2.png) [@tsvika\_elberger](https://forums.collective2.com/u/tsvika_elberger)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2016, 9:06am UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/5 "2016-01-24T09:06:51Z")

</div>

Yesterday the data was i said before.  
The system was with 1382% gains and 100% DD  
It’s good that i capture rhe screen.  
Anyway if you Check the Risk of ruin you still see 100% the chance to 10-50% chance of account lost

So how the system on sanday have totally another numbers from the day before??

![](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/uploads/collective2/2231/4ad1147abebbec87.jpg) ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tsvika\_elberger](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/tsvika_elberger/32/238_2.png) [@tsvika\_elberger](https://forums.collective2.com/u/tsvika_elberger)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2016, 9:10am UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/6 "2016-01-24T09:10:14Z")

</div>

C2 Score could be many things but i think its can’t ignore risk parameters which are the most important factor that people sometimes ignore.

We should Trust in something. some people trust God, some use C2 score  
i trust myself only (90% of time).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carzxxz](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/carzxxz/32/594_2.png) [@carzxxz](https://forums.collective2.com/u/carzxxz)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2016, 4:23pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/7 "2016-01-24T16:23:03Z")

</div>

Tsvika, I can verify the stats for TwistSTM3 are as you indicated because I checked the system a few minutes after your post. As I recall it also had an intra-day drawdown of around -$132K at some point. I was amazed the system had functioned with negative net equity over some days.

However, when I checked back a short time later the system had “magically” transformed to its current state. I also saw some outlandish stats for Genefish Hong Kong a short time after the system was re-scaled a while back so maybe a C2 software bug is responsible?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatthewKlein](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/matthewklein/32/21382_2.png) [@MatthewKlein](https://forums.collective2.com/u/MatthewKlein)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2016, 4:59pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/8 "2016-01-24T16:59:38Z")

</div>

Guys -

Nothing mysterious going on here.

When Tsvika made his post I examined the stats and trading record, and I saw that there were a handful of forex trades that had quantities that were not possible. I manually went back and removed the erroneous quantities. I am currently looking into how the quantities were generated. (I don’t yet have an answer, but will communicate directly with the strategy developer.)

On a more general note: even though trades on C2 are labeled as hypothetical, I consider it my responsibility to ensure that all trading records are as accurate and realistic as possible. When I see something that is obviously the result of either a data import error, or some other software error, I try to take quick action to bring the track record into line with reality. Tsvika’s original post brought this to my attention.

Matthew

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatthewKlein](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/matthewklein/32/21382_2.png) [@MatthewKlein](https://forums.collective2.com/u/MatthewKlein)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2016, 3:36pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/100-dd-ans-still-alive/8406/10 "2016-01-25T15:36:42Z")

</div>


