# ETF Timer now ranked #1 on 5 different Leader Boards!

**URL:** <https://forums.collective2.com/t/etf-timer-now-ranked-1-on-5-different-leader-boards/16827>\
**Category:** C2\
**Created:** [July 1, 2025, 7:56pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/etf-timer-now-ranked-1-on-5-different-leader-boards/16827 "2025-07-01T19:56:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SeanKelly11](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/seankelly11/32/19323_2.png) [@SeanKelly11](https://forums.collective2.com/u/SeanKelly11)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2025, 8:23pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/etf-timer-now-ranked-1-on-5-different-leader-boards/16827/21 "2025-07-07T20:23:39Z")

</div>

To those raising concerns similar to my dedicated follower Babbage\_9010, let me clarify the process. I compile the monthly returns of ETF Timer by copying and pasting them into SuperGrok or another AI tool. You can easily do the same with your own system or any strategy you’re evaluating. Simply input the data and request an analysis, asking for metrics like CAGR and maximum drawdowns.

In my view, this is an incredibly valuable tool for assessing performance. I welcome questions and scrutiny—that’s the purpose of open discussion. It’s frustrating when one individual, even a prominent fan, presumes to speak for everyone.

In short, this tool is highly effective, and I encourage you to try it yourself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JITF](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/jitf/32/24092_2.png) [@JITF](https://forums.collective2.com/u/JITF)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2025, 3:26pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/etf-timer-now-ranked-1-on-5-different-leader-boards/16827/22 "2025-07-08T15:26:08Z")

</div>

> [@SeanKelly11](#):
>
> JTTF, while I’m straight-up slamming your nonsense, what are you trying to get at? What’s your actual point?

Not sure what you slammed and where, but I can repeat my point, no problem. I thought it was quite clear from my first post, but here it is:

> [@JITF](#):
>
> Collective2 reports 15% annual return for ETF timer, Super Grok states 24% for 2008-2025. Max DD for that period is 44% in 2010-2011 per Collective2 and Grok reported only 30% worst loss in 2020.
> 
> Stating smaller worst loss for ETF timer and still saying that it is riskier due to monthly volatility also questionable conclusion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SeanKelly11](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/forums.collective2.com/seankelly11/32/19323_2.png) [@SeanKelly11](https://forums.collective2.com/u/SeanKelly11)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2025, 5:53pm UTC](https://forums.collective2.com/t/etf-timer-now-ranked-1-on-5-different-leader-boards/16827/23 "2025-07-08T17:53:50Z")

</div>

You are welcome to do the same, and then you can draw your conclusions by examining what C2 and AI say. That was my point. I was not saying C2 was wrong.

[Previous page](https://forums.collective2.com/t/etf-timer-now-ranked-1-on-5-different-leader-boards/16827.md?page=1)