For the most part, I’ve found Palson’s writings (not just in this forum) to consist of “a lot of filler and very little meat.” Given the spewing of enough analogies interspersed with quotes from famous people used out of context, anyone can create enough “word chaos” and confusion to avoid addressing the subject at hand.
Most of the prosaic writing that I’ve read from him can be reduced to a few sentences at most, and when that exercise is carried out, what you’re left with is curiously devoid of content.
