I don’t see why it would be impossible to use the average fill. This is also reported in the trade details if you click “Yes, show real trades from subscriber broker accounts”. So actually you say that this information, although available and displayed, is not used in the statistic?
I don’t see why it would be impossible to use the average fill.
Technically it’s hard to reproduce. Hmmm… as example. I use GTC orders and from the point you don’t need any autotrading software after putting your order to your broker. What is average fill for a subscriber who don’t run TB? 0? Another example: Most of Tango subscribers don’t autotrade, but they put their orders in reality. How will we calculate average fill? By majority or minority of subscribers? And so on.
So actually you say that this information, although available and displayed, is not used in the statistic?
Yes. You cannot use it. Unfortunately, you have to have the stats yourself on your account for market orders in stocks.
Eu
The statistic isn’t about manual trading. The tooltip clearly states that it is about autotrading. Furthermore, in the case of extreme-os the tooltip says that they analyzed more than 24,000 trade executions to calculate the slippage. The system made 1135 in its history up to today, and each trade has a single entry signal and a single exit signal, so on average they must have used more than 10 fills per signal.
This is not what C2 does, Eu. I need to examine the data in question to find out what leads to the wrong result.
Like I said, Con Eu is a wierd guy unable to see reality clearly even when it is staring him at his face. He is suffering from rabies infested de-rangement. He should soon see a qualified psychologist…
Aren’t you going to insult MK while he’s here?
>He is suffering from rabies infested de-rangement.
You aren’t infested by rabies, you are infected. And he would be
deranged, not de-ranged… Geez, for someone who writes
so much you sure are thick. Maybe this is why you are
dumbfounded by the challenge of creating a successful system.
Zero for 14…oh, but that is MK’s and C2’s fault right?
Glad I could help with “rabis” though.
"You aren’t infested by rabies, you are infected."
In his case he is the infection.
"He is suffering from rabies infested de-rangement."
By comparison, you’re just a ranting lunatic.
2JE
Furthermore, in the case of extreme-os the tooltip says that they analyzed more than 24,000 trade executions to calculate the slippage.
Maybe something wrong with the stats. It’s not probable slippage imho.
2MK
This is not what C2 does, Eu.
It how it looks in public data;) Intention and implementation are two different things.
Eu
