The opinions expressed in these forums do not represent those of C2, and any discussion of profit/loss
is not indicative of future performance or success.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading. You should therefore carefully consider
whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. You should read,
understand, and consider the Risk Disclosure Statement that is provided by your broker
before you consider trading. Most people who trade lose money.
If you are a strategy manager here on C2, if you go to your “Maximum Position Sizes” page, you will see increase size limits. I hope you will be pleased.
Please keep in mind that we may need to reduce some or all of these limits if regulators tell us that Collective2 signals are potentially disrupting markets.
It is based on the trading volume of each contract at the exchange; and, on C2, the number of subscribers and the amount of capital deployed via autotrading.
i’ll continue trading my account and see what pops up as signals through C2. I’m just afraid that the signals will stop at some level and subs get stuck on bad positions
The maximum is 7 contracts for your strategy model account. This is the # of contracts your strategy Model can open. Your subscribers will in aggregate open many more contracts than this.
What’s the formula for this max size? for MES and ES for example
i know you said it’s factoring in contract at the exchange; and, on C2, the number of subscribers and the amount of capital deployed via autotrading.
if you share that formula with the managers, it will help us to know what maximum subscriber is ideal for the type of trading they do, instead of just checking this link to see what’s available
7 contracts for model account would not work for me, cause i trade based on scaling and work around avg position. Even with ES at 14 contracts (which i’m not ready to switch over to yet) is barely workable.
Starting to feel like my way of trading is not suitable now. It’s unfortunate since I was really just taking off in performance.
The only other option is to end this current strategy, start a new strategy, just trade 1 contract and limit the number of subs and jack up the subscription fee. Subs can adjust their size on their end.
It sucks on my end cause i wont be making any decent money from my own account trading 1 mes contract per position.
7 contracts for model account would not work for me, cause i trade based on scaling and work around avg position. Even with ES at 14 contracts (which i’m not ready to switch over to yet) is barely workable.
Sounds like you are basically averaging down as trades move against you, waiting for a reversal, i.e. a Martingale? In which case, I would much rather you start a new strategy that “just trades 1 contract” as you propose. Sounds like a statistically better outcome for subscribers.
I can confirm my systems can work now normally. (Although limits for my system looks a bit too much relaxed(!), but I must admit I never really looked at those numbers prior to this issue)
great, that would help in mitigating issues beforehand. ( if you can also let us know a specific time at which position limits are set daily , that would be even better)
Does the capital depends on real portfolio size of the account or scaling (Strategy )? For example I’m subscribe for a strategy which the portfolio is 250,000$ but my portfolio account is only 90,000$ Will I affect his position limits?
No, the size of the Model Account has no direct bearing on position limits. Regulatory position size limits are based on the magnitude of capital following your strategy, not the strategy’s model size.