Mosaik (E. Agg.) Test (17.3%)
(E. Agg.) Test3 (17.1%)
Indigo Futures System (16.5%)
Magnum (Conservative) Forex (16%)
(E. Agg.) Test2 (15.3%)
Magnum (Conservative) Futures (14%)
AAA FX (12.6%)
Isn’t that about 5 Palsun systems on the losers of the week?
> Isn’t that about 5 Palsun systems on the losers of the week?
He’s doing better, only three this week. I like his "conservative"
approach: down 40% in a week.
Losers this week
Magnum (Conservative) Futures (40.5%)
Midas (V. Agg.) Test (35.8%)
Mosaik (E. Agg.) Test (31.5%)
Somehow, he seems to crow when doing “well” and gets silent when things like this happen. Similar to unrealized drawdowns don’t count, but open profits do…
I kind of like the sideshow, though…
"The name of this system has been changed 1 time:
Original name Changed to When changed
Magnum (Conservative) ForexMagnum (Conservative) Test 4/12/07 "
Is there a particular drawdown level where we should expect the name
change to "Test". I notice the systems that win are not called "Test",
but when they lose about 30%+ then they become a "Test". Is there a
formula for this?
TIA.
