Dear Matthew et al,
was sent this today by Attain. http://www.attaincapital.com/alternatives/alt_jan1005.htm#topic
Shows different ways of ranking and many different results accordingly. Also shows just how hard ranking is! I suspect that a one-size-fits-all ranking approach might be self-defeating and that it might be better to search by field, similar to how the newsletter did it, i.e. W/L (since you like that one!), Sharpe, Stirling, Expectancy, ratio of Proft to DD etc. That way your viewers can get a feel for which approach keeps coming up high depending on how they are looking.
Carry On!
There will be a completely new searching/ranking method introduced shortly (a couple weeks). It involves a substantial software upgrade. Working on it now. - MK
