NormanBooth2
I’m not sure why developers/trades have just one plan based on things going north.
No plans for south? 
The opinions expressed in these forums do not represent those of C2, and any discussion of profit/loss is not indicative of future performance or success. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading. You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. You should read, understand, and consider the Risk Disclosure Statement that is provided by your broker before you consider trading. Most people who trade lose money.
NormanBooth2
I’m not sure why developers/trades have just one plan based on things going north.
No plans for south? 
BTW- Is this a “long only” strategy suitable for IRA’s?
I really wish C2 would put an " IRA friendly" stamp on those strategies that are. We need to be able to filter/screen for them in “the grid” too.
Strange …competitor advice is price strategy at the same price that Volatility Returns or higher. This becomes the “old song”. Most competitors don’t realize/understand their pricing suggestions from where it comes and why. Somehow nobody from them will never suggest price lower that his/her strategy.
Looks like Robert’s strategy and Norman’s strategies, by Norman suggestion, should have the same value even Norman’s strategy is TOS and has C2 track record. I think Norman tries to sell himself short or he thinks that VolaVIX is much superior to Volatility Returns even without TOS and C2 track record.
If I’m wrong with my analysis?
Assuming that strategy will be successful in the future (low DD and later P/L), all competitors suggest price higher that their strategies, why not cut price to $29 and have other low correlated strategies at higher prices in the offer (VIXTrader & VIXTrader Professional)?
I think I can be a good example what will happen.
Doesn’t matter what you charge as long as sub make more money then what you charge them. It would be good if you had a long term track record.