The opinions expressed in these forums do not represent those of C2, and any discussion of profit/loss
is not indicative of future performance or success.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading. You should therefore carefully consider
whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. You should read,
understand, and consider the Risk Disclosure Statement that is provided by your broker
before you consider trading. Most people who trade lose money.
@newt That would not be anything serious, you would just go into negative balance with your broker and owe them an insignificant amount of let’s say $10k-$100k so nothing to worry about.
Martingale strategies always end badly. From my point of view, it is impossible to positively highlight one of them. I have not specifically reviewed it’s strategy, so I can not specifically talk about it. I only refer, in general terms, Martingale strategies.
I think you have to draw a distinction between the edge the strategy provides (the model) and the sizing strategy/risk management. I’m invested in it because he seems to have a good edge. If I understood his strategy correctly, he’s basically got a trend following model that issues a signal once a day (go long or short). I like that and I want that in my portfolio. If you do a calculation of expected value you will see that his strategy has a very high E(v).
His sizing strategy is a different story though, especially since he doesn’t use stop losses. I’ve stated my opinion above that I think for the size of the account, trading up to 6 contracts (usually 3 or 4) is too big, however C2 allows you to scale and you can feel free to scale down to something safer, say 33%. Even at that small scaling you’d probably generate close to 100% per year in returns, but your risk of a big drawdown should be vanishingly small since the probability of extreme market moves doesn’t scale linearly with the size of the move but exponentially (inversely).
Even a strategy with 99% winners cannot survive in the long run if it is traded so big that a loser costs you 60% of your capital.
edit: I prefer futures over stocks generally because in the US they have tax advantages and because they trade almost 24 hours a day and index futures are very, very liquid.
Ideally you would want to compare an actively managed strategy vs just ‘buy and hold’ to compare if there are any advantage. You could have bought YM back in april 2017 and held for the same ~27k gain per contract, and if add 1 per 10k in gain will also get over 600% return. Can’t go wrong with any dip adding long strategy since 2011 as long as you have the capital to not be liquidated.
As a trader, in my opinion the days of new highs are over on the indexes. Market will enter a consolidation phase and any highs will only be marginal and sold into for the next few month. So we will see how these system will hold up as market shifts gear