Hello Aytac,
Nice to meet you. I have typed in a preliminary version of my script and
it seems to work to a certain
limited degree, although there is a lot of room for improvement.
In the business of getting a script to work, (the way that I learned it
in school), you have to progress
through the “edit-compile-re-edit” cycle. But that requires at some
point that the programmer can
print the values of intermediate computations to the screen and/or the
printer to perform what they
call “debugging”.
The problem that I ran into is that I think I made a logical error in
the typing in and design of the coding
that requires that I display the results of intermediate computations,
but I don’t see how to do that yet
in my learning of the SeeTu language. (I know very well how to do it in
C#, because that’s what I do every
day). It’s hard to learn a new language from scratch compared to working
with one that you have been
working with for many years.
If you would like to work with me on this project, I could either let
you in with part of the profits of
the indicator, (which would work better for me, because I am low on
cash), or else pay you with my
credit card, or with Paypal, (which I would rather not do right this
moment).
The idea of the indicator is like this: it computes a long sequence of
indicators and “scores” them,
meaning that it measures their win/loss ratios in the historical past
100 days into the past. Then, it
decides to use that indicator which has the highest score of the scoring
system.
I spent a lot of time researching this idea, and it turns out that when
the number of preliminary indicators
that are “scored” by the scoring formula is greater than just a handful,
(meaning like greater than 20+),
that the indicator starts to take shape and get’s the up/down future
direction of the stock well close
to 98% of the time.
My preliminary version of the indicator has an annual ROI of 512%, (in
hypothetical testing). I am confident
that if I get the bugs out of it, that I can reach an ROI that is even
much higher than that.