Now that’s what I’d call a rather Turgid Move BIG FELLA…Hahaha
Nice recovery. I’m staying subbed
Yes, nice recovery.
But 26% draw down and the system is only 5 months live…
S&P 500 max draw down was only ~6%.
I’m curious what the system does when the S&P 500 corrects more than 20%.
1 Like
This a triple based ETF system so 18% dd. would be more appropriate.
On Apr. 12, I attempted to switch from Soxl to Soxs 4 minutes later. I don’t understand exactly what occurred but that cost me about 10% dd., 5% I lost and 5% I would have gained had I been in Soxs, so if not for that, Rizz would now have a 16% dd.
RIZZ follows a set of rules I created based on Tqqq, but to try to appease subscribers I played Soxl which has more potential for gains.
The Rules & Indicators Imo. for Rizz are extremely sound. but that last run was a combination of my great indicators with a burst of exceptional adrenaline fueled instinct which I tend to exhibit when my back’s up against the wall, so don’t expect to see that type of run again for 7 days in a row where I nearly perfectly nailed every trade peak.
He closes down the system, creates a new profile and a new name & runs a similar system with similar commentary on the boards, until that one implodes…
Rinse repeat.
2 Likes
The troll above this post with the fake Alias has operated THREE FAILED SYSTEMS. What he won’t tell you is that 99% of all systems on C2 have failed or closed up shop do to not being content with lousy systems with large Draw downs. Yes that’s right, 99% I may be wrong but if you add up the possibly 10,000 plus systems that statement may be accurate. The amazing thing is some of the highest drawdown systems with 50%-70% have the most subscribers. That’s absurd, I’d shut down any system with a 50 plus drawdown, that’s just embarrassing.
Another thing i’d like to touch upon is this troll keeps pushing how great Trades Your Own System is but actually it’s not great at all as these systems underperform.
This guy is actually bad for C2 business.
In conclusion, Failed Systems and leaders dissatisfied with their systems are not just the majority, they are the norm.
All statements above are simply my opinion.
1 Like
Many, if not most, people attracted to trading are like the old cigar-smoking guys I used to see in the OTB parlor as a kid.
Let’s not call them degenerate gamblers but it does appeal to the adrenaline junkies.
I used to frequent the OTB myself, I would put 4 horses on top with the chalk 2nd and get some nice payoffs.
Bottom line is leaders are just following the rules, if you don’t like it get out of here or take it up with management, basically leave these fine people alone.
Actually, my systems were all profitable. Closed them down because they didn’t really mesh with C2.
(one was closed with a trade still open 
)
Note I don’t change my profile every year like you, create a new fake name and run the same system, scamming investors until you blow up.
Probably. They make good money off of people like you. You make some free money too.
Unfortunately investors don’t.
1 Like
You would think by now my other aliases would come rushing to assist.
He must of been a very Colicky Baby.
Unprofessional and unsubscribed.
2 Likes
Goldman Sachs is very professional, give them a looksy.
Good luck Dylan!!
1 Like
Here’s a quote of the day…
1 Like
Well if they have the “balls to ride out Drawdowns” maybe we can watch this live chart tick up. 
1 Like
And, it’s gone Private.
twin bother “prana” https://collective2.com/details/146768744 is “alive”. No pun intended
1 Like
