The opinions expressed in these forums do not represent those of C2, and any discussion of profit/loss
is not indicative of future performance or success.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading. You should therefore carefully consider
whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. You should read,
understand, and consider the Risk Disclosure Statement that is provided by your broker
before you consider trading. Most people who trade lose money.
on "find startegy’ we have "leader board list"
i like this section ans sort systems by returns
I wonder why with all data on this leader systems c2 doesn’t show which system have “TOS certified” so we can check which systems with this sign do best.
(to see if system have TOS we need you go to the system page)
If c2 board can add this feature it would be great.
We’re going to be a tackling the Grid in a separate release soon and have requests for a number of additional columns which we’ll be including. For the Leaderboard, the new filter functionality is live. I welcome feedback on other helpful searches.
Please, please, PLEASE add the ability to have “delayed” searches that return data from a time in the past (e.g. from 3 or 6 months ago). If Grid searches returned results from data 3 or 6 months ago rather than on live data it would go a long way to solving the selection bias problem inherent in live searches. You could skip having to watch a system perform for a number of months to confirm its performance before subscribing. Watch lists wouldn’t be needed. See the following 2 posts for more on this:
Sounds great. It seems like there could be some Explorer scripts written for a similar task of comparing systems; I’ve not spent enough time in there to figure it out myself. Something simple perhaps, like the “Relative Performance” script by seph (#205) but with a specifiable start date so that it creates the equivalent of a Perf Chart at stockcharts.com, but for the chosen systems rather than chosen equities.
Somehow this question nobody ask from customers but only non-TOS developers who risk running strategy is ZERO and subscription is upside. Their business model is subscription, no trading profits because they do not have real money involved. They can go crazy in any single day without any consequences to their account.
I think Robert and DanceWithTheTrend worry that people will start using TOS filter will be more accessible and more often used, what directly will affect their business, I understand Robert’s strategies, because they have valuable track record that can compensate non-TOS for some people.
I think a non-TOS system may actual perform better than a TOS system…Up to a point. Being unencumbered by the psychological weight of seeing one’s own account on the line and in the red, decisions can be of a “coin toss nature” and with some luck lead to stellar results, until that day arrives when the system wipes out completely that is. I’ve seen several non-TOS systems perform exceptionally well for months only to get completely hammered to death in a matter of days. I don’t think a TOS system would go the same route since few, if any, developers are willing to put their own accounts under so much risk as to be potentially wiped out with a few trades. Most will have safeguards and hedges (which cost money, i.e. performance). For this reason many non-TOS systems may perform better up until that day of reckoning. Reward is a function of risk. Anyone recall the non-TOS system called ConserveProfit…
Take a Forex TOS developer for instance; he could trade micro lots on his/her own personal account and lose maybe a “big” 50 dollars a month if his system enters a major drawdown, but still collect let’s say 2000 dollars a month from his subscribers.
So while TOS label is a useful information, it is not a guarantee that the system will do better in the long run, or that the developer will not take unnecessary risks.
Only a serious study could reveal if indeed TOS systems perform better than “regular” systems.
Once again I am not the issue here, and I don’t have to prove anything.
Since there are only a few TOS systems (and hundreds and hundreds of “regular” systems), it is much much easier and less time-consuming to conduct a study on these systems first, and see if they truly give the traders some hidden additional advantage, like better risk-adjusted return, less drawdown, smoother equity curve, and so forth.