Name one that did it with real money? To clarify I mean with a TOS badge or simply with fills from real subscribers.
2 Likes
It was one system, forex, millions on equity, caught around 100% drawdown finally, probably went private. I don’t remember the name, maybe @OSUTIA can recall it.
This system’s risk is 90-100% of capital. It is just not come to that point yet.
2 Likes
Guys, the point is, Avi did manage to return fantastic profits with extremely small risk, in 6 months, trading very liquid financial instruments.
Really?
Could you please show us your calculations?
There’s been a lot of martingale systems that do amazing for a couple of months (200-300% gains). You can search back in the forums to find them. I cannot link to them because none of them exist anymore. They all blow up. This strategy isn’t doing this performance with real money.
Given our past discussions about risk and leverage it doesn’t really surprise me that you don’t understand how risky a martingale system like this is. They’re always the best performing strategies until one trade goes against them.
BTW, I’m still curious about the strategy you started in September. How much leverage do you use in your strategies? Can you link to it?
2 Likes
I can make 150-200% easily, it’s just DD. would be 35% or so and not sure if anyone would buy the system. Which raises the question would anyone be interested in a system that makes 150% with a 40% dd.
There’s no blanket answer as it seems it goes both ways out here.
Maybe I’ll let it ride.
Again you are not answering the question: name just one C2 system that made $200,000 profit in 6 months but lost only $4,000 of initial capital in the process.
See, very simple question.
This time it is empirical. 
By the way check out what happens with another system you were impressed - Most expensive strategy?
There you go, it’s all about drawdowns and ROI.
Avi tripled his account in 6 months and he only experienced a 4% drawdown (from starting capital)
And yet everybody is criticizing him, go figure.
Max equity drawdown reported by C2 is 18%, approx 29k. This is 29% to initial capital. But since he had no subs, C2 equity doesn’t have all of the points. So lets look into the trades - max in-trade drawdown is 50% or 39300$. But he was lucky at that time.
Wrong, Avi started with 100K, then lost 4K before earning 200K (net profit), see for yourself.
As I said numerous times, his real drawdown was 4% (from starting capital).
…
1 Like
Laughing is good, but it won’t change the facts.
My new system will be ready in October, I still need to make a few adjustments to avoid choppy markets.
Sorry, my bad. But the way you calculate real drawdown and risk based on it just killed me. Where did you take it? Books, some papers?
1 Like
In this case with the same initial capital of 100k I can trade 3x size and have 12% risk and 3x profit? Right?
You enter a casino with $1000 and you two hours later you go home with $2000 in your pocket.
At some point you were down $40 (before earning that extra $1000).
What is your maximum drawdown?
96% if I went down from 1000 directly to 40.
But answer on my question about risk increase, please.
No, down $40 means you lost $40.
