Enjoy taking over the world.
1 Like
When I asked him why he does not use micros instead of e-minis (his futures trades were some of his most profitable up to that time) so that his subscribers who were scaling at 10% could follow him and he replied that this would increase the commission cost in his own account it became clear to me that he was not watching out for the interest of his subscribers just to save a few dollars. So I am glad I stopped at that time when I still had a tiny bit of profit.
3 Likes
You expecting to make a lot of quick money off sub fees is like unrealistic investors thinking they can get rick quick picking the right strategies. My oldest strategy isnāt even a year yet and is still free until 1/1/21. Iām beating the market with a lower drawdown. I know it may take a while for even the possibility of deriving an income off this. I can imagine itās hard for any investor to have faith in someone elseās trading skills.
Yeah but when you make $50k+ a month, you kinda have the option to do whatever you want. I thought it woulda been good supplemental income but it didnāt scale to the degree I was expecting given the quality of most strategies here (like almost none TOS).
And yes if I am making $400 after fees from subs I definitely donāt I want to incur 5x that in monthly trading costs if it can be avoided.
These threads are comical.
āI started trading micros instead of minis in sizes that are dividable by 3, so 3, 6, 9, 12 in case you or someone has a smaller account and wants to follow only 1/3 of a sizeā is what my man at Demeter US Growth just wrote me. Heās a bit in the red but thatās a good place to start, right?
Some would say āitās better than buying at the topā others may say āyouāre catching a falling knifeā. Only hindsight will let you know which is right.
Maybe drop the subscription fee now? 
1 Like
In general, I prefer that there are no links to (vaguely) competitive services on this web site.
In an effort to try and make my point without diverting people away from C2, Iāll keep it simple. Someone came on the forums saying they had a goal of 5-10% per month. They showed a track record from somewhere other than C2. They continued to use very large amounts of leverage and the account according to C2 crash majorly.
The person blamed it on C2 not reading the results of their account completely. However, the outside track record, off C2 also showed the massive drop also. Once again I would refer anyone new to C2 to the original post in my thread here.
4 Likes
Seems to me that this guy guessed the previous market correctly and with the leverage got good results. Having thousands of traders out there, at any point of time somebody will be lucky. 
Then market switched regime (several TQQQ systems also failed around that time), his trading broke and excuses started.
1 Like
Not sure why you are quoting my post InteractiveAssets 
Congratulations! Keep improving and working hard to produce better result for you and your clients. Also donāt listen or care about @InteractiveAssets. He is number 1 critics who always write negative comments about new and upcoming strategy developers.
Good Luck!
This guy quit already after he experienced losses. 
Thatās sad. May be couldnāt handle some bad comments here. I like new blood who are trying and exploring the systems.
Sure. Bad comments on the forum, C2 doesnāt track something, black cat crossing the road in front of the car. There are always some explanations for losses.
1 Like
Whoops, just meant to link the original post I had made not your comment
1 Like
No problem InteractiveAssets, have a nice day,
1 Like
Oh Yeah. maybe not. maybe didnāt have enough interest or skills. I will just ignore @InteractiveAssets comment here, he is living his life on subscription money so definitely shit scared.
